SpaceX’s satellite internet service was rejected over local ownership rules. Now it’s going directly to the people.
Starlink isn’t going quietly.
After Namibia’s Communications Regulatory Authority (Cran) rejected its application for a telecommunications license and radio spectrum access on March 23, the SpaceX-owned satellite internet provider has broken its silence, and it came out swinging.
In a public statement, Starlink called Cran’s characterization of its non-compliance “misleading” and pushed back on the regulator’s public interest findings, saying they “appear to reflect a misunderstanding” of how the company operates across its 164 global markets.
It also urged Namibians to petition Cran directly for a formal appeal, essentially mobilizing public pressure to reverse a regulatory decision.
What Namibia actually said no to
The core issue is ownership. Namibia requires a minimum of 51% local ownership for telecoms licensees. Starlink has a blanket global policy against diluting its local equity, the same position that has blocked its entry into South Africa, where Icasa requires 30% equity to go to historically disadvantaged South Africans.
Starlink acknowledged that Namibia’s framework allows ministerial exemptions to the ownership rule. No exemption was granted. And rather than find a workaround, the company is now contesting the decision publicly.
Perhaps the most eyebrow-raising part of Starlink’s statement is its claim that 98.6% of public submissions during Cran’s consultation process supported its application. The company did not provide details on how many total submissions were received or how the consultation was structured, which makes that figure difficult to verify or contextualize.
Still, it’s the kind of number that plays well in a public advocacy campaign. And Starlink clearly knows how to run one. In South Africa, it launched a dedicated website, pledged R500-million to connect rural schools, and encouraged citizens to write directly to Icasa in support of regulatory reform. The Namibia playbook looks very similar.
The connectivity argument
Starlink’s strongest card is the numbers on the ground. Its statement points out that more than 30% of Namibians currently lack internet access, 65% of schools have no reliable connectivity, and 80% of health facilities are running on 3G or worse.
It also pointed to what it’s done elsewhere in the region, over 600 health facilities connected in Zambia, more than 300 schools in Mozambique, and 150 reduced-price connectivity kits deployed in Botswana under that country’s SmartBots digital transformation programme.
The argument is straightforward: Namibia’s regulations are keeping its own people offline.
Cran’s process allows for decisions to be reconsidered either on its own motion or through a petition filed by an aggrieved party, within 90 days. Starlink is betting that enough public pressure, combined with its formal response, could reopen that door.
Whether Namibia moves or holds its ground will be worth watching. Ownership localization rules exist for real reasons; the same debate is playing out across the continent. But so does the connectivity gap.
This one isn’t over.
Interesting read: A Nigerian startup is building AI for Africans, and they just turned down $500,000 to prove it
Leave a comment